Teaching for Abstraction: Teacher Learning

Paul White, Sue Wilson, Michael Mitchelmore


Working collaboratively with the researchers, a small team of teachers developed and taught two Grade 6 mathematics lessons based on the Teaching for Abstraction model (White & Mitchelmore, 2010). This paper reports how one teacher learned about the model and implemented it in practice. It was found that she assimilated several key features of the model, such as starting with several embodiments of the target concept and guiding students to look for similarities between them. However, it was more difficult for her to help students abstract and reify the target concept and link it to other mathematical concepts. It was concluded that teachers also need to abstract Teaching for Abstraction, and need more embodiments of it before they can reify and implement an effective model.


learning by abstraction; Lesson Study; primary school education; professional growth; teacher learning

Full Text:



Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.

Cluskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381-391.

Davidov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalisation in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Dienes, Z. P. (1963). An experimental study of mathematics-learning. London: Hutchinson.

Hart, L. C., Alston, A. S., & Murata, A. (Eds.).(2011). Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education: Learning together. New York: Springer.

Jaworski, B. (2004). Insiders and outsiders in mathematics teaching development: The design and study of classroom activity. Research in Mathematics Education, 6, 3-22.

Mitchelmore, M. C. (2000). Empirical is not mathematical! Reflections, 25(2), 13-15.

Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2000). Teaching for abstraction: Reconstructing constructivism. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000 (Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 432-439). Perth: MERGA.

Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2002a). Teaching angles by abstraction: A professional development experiment in Year 3. Unpublished report, New South Wales Department of Education and Training, Sydney. Retrieved 5 May 2011 from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/primary/mathematics/assets/pdf/angles_report01.pdf

Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2002b). Teaching angles by abstraction: A second professional development experiment. Unpublished report, New South Wales Department of Education and Training, Sydney. Retrieved 5 May 2011 from


Mitchelmore, M. C., & White, P. (2004). Abstraction in mathematics and mathematics learning. In In M. J. Høines& A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 329-336). Bergen, Norway: Program Committee.

New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2003). Teaching about angles:Stage 2. Ryde, NSW: Author.

Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2008). Addressing changing assessment agendas: Impact of professional development on secondary mathematics teachers in NSW. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 66-80.

Skemp, R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics. (2nd ed.) Harmondsworth:Penguin.

Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2009). Converting mathematics tasks to learning opportunities: An important aspect of knowledge for mathematics teaching. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21, 85-105.

White, P., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2010). Teaching for abstraction: A model. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 205-226.

White, P., Mitchelmore, M. C., Wilson, S., & Faragher, R. (2008). Teaching percentages:Professional learning in three regional Catholic schools. Journal of Catholic School Studies, 80(2), 55-62.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v2i1.15


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexed by:


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org

p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

Supported by: